The car I wish I could have

Home  \  Off Topic  \  The car I wish I could have

check this out

posted by  zero_emissions

Don't we all? :drool:

Actually the R34 Skyline is my favourite car too, and my goal in life is to own one lol :smoke:

posted by  chris_knows

R33 sweety :wink2:

posted by  99integra

It's definitely a great car, but not the BEST :laughing:

It looks a bit too big IMO...

posted by  chris_knows

Everyone knows my dream car is the Nismo tuned R32...
Picture 1 (http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e300/elchango36/19_1024.jpg)

Picture 2 (http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e300/elchango36/R32-Rain.gif)

posted by  elchango36

http://image03.webshots.com/3/0/14/98/1201498_ph.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/~blackgtx/nov1.jpg

Can only wish.

posted by  Benson

wow... i was kinda drawn away from the verynice car by the crappy graf. art on the wall

posted by  starscream0

Is it just my imagination, or are the posted pics getting really f*cking big again?

posted by  vwhobo

No. Actaully they aren't big at all. They don't even fill up the whole Firefox window I have open, and that window doesn't use up all of my screen space. And this computer is a smaller monitor than the ones I have at work... ;) Time to upgrade from 640x480 there, Hobo... ;) People post 800x600 pictures minimum in most automotive forums, with 1280x1024 becoming common on car forums.

Time to stop coddling those used to ascii graphics and 14.4 modems... hehehehehe!

posted by  ChrisV

I recently switched from 800x600 to 1280x1024. Took some getting used to actually.

posted by  Benson

Unfortunately though Chris, it's the job of the members to accommodate each other with what the worst screen resollution can handle, not just assume everybody is as hightech as yourself :thumbs:

I've edited the largest of the picts atleast!

posted by  Cliffy

Why was the smaller pic edited??? It's tinier than the Charger pic and that wasn't shrinked!!!!:cussing:

posted by  elchango36

The sublime coloured one is a Challenger, and the other one is a GTX. ;)

posted by  Benson

To make the post look more even lol...Just would have looked strange the other way :thumbs:

posted by  Cliffy

I am more of an NSX fan:wink2: .

posted by  fudge

Forgive my stupidity.:doh:

posted by  elchango36

Ok, everybody, NO MORE PICTURES ever, just in case some of us can't see them at all due to still runing on 9200 baud modems and 13" 80 column text only screens. There MIGHT be users on '80s Kaypros out there, you know!

How about that, encouraging lowest common denominator. First in thought, now in everything...

:banghead: :banghead:

posted by  ChrisV

Now you're taking the piss. It's just down to common sense really, something you seem to lack. I edited one picture that was too large because it filled the average screen resollution, although loading times also afect some computers, that isn't the reason most people dislike large pictures, it's because it fills the screen, of which can be rectified by simply linking us to them. It really isn't that difficult or time consuming to do. I also have no idea what a 9200 baud modem is.....:banghead:

posted by  Cliffy

I was looking for a Kaypro a couple of weeks back just for the hell of it, so I kinda know the very basic parts lol...Bauds are a unit of measurement (like bits per second). It was more common in the 1980's, with the '80's edition of the internet lol. One baud is one signal change, but since signals can be different sizes, they changed it to BPS. :thumbs:

posted by  chris_knows

I think he was referring to the 9200

posted by  Wally

My wife has a really hot baud. :wink2:

posted by  vwhobo

:laughing:

posted by  Wally

I like milk and cookies. Coincidence? I think not.

http://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/2231195-dggif.gif

posted by  Benson

Your Message