Makes & Models   Car Specs   Car Pictures   Car Dealers   Classifieds   Forums     My CF
car forums

Got my new Camera

Important: The following is a text only archive!
For full features; Go to Got my new Camera

So I got a nice deal on a Canon Rebel 400D (Rebel XTi) with a kit lens, and got it yesterday. Of course I was so excited I went downtown with a friend of mine at midnight and took pictures. Here are some samples, mine and his. He is using a Nikon D50 with some non-kit lens.

Mine:
1. The night started off semi-well with me setting my ISO to 1600...noob move, pictures ruined.
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/922/img0048ny1.jpg
2. Then I proceeded to run through the White Balance menu and **** something up, pictures ruined.
http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/733/img0071qg1.jpg
3. Finally at 2am I got his tripod and made things right. Here is my shot of the night, first day with the camera.
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/2055/img0079gh8.jpg



His: He only uploaded 2 so far, and said they were distorted, but here goes anyway.
1.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/LBCsublime9/DSC_0250.jpg
2.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/LBCsublime9/DSC_0253.jpg


To be honest, first day with a full manual, I had a hard time balancing WB, ISO, F.stop, and Apperature to get my shit right, any pointers?? How do you like the shots?? posted by  newyorker

The first 2 don't look special, but the third one looks cool. How long was your shutter speed for it?

Your friend's second picture looks cool. The first one looks a bit "distorted". posted by  chris_knows

Last one had a shutter speed of 25 seconds
edit: ISO was 100
F.stop was 5.6

zoom at ~24mm
Focus all the way out posted by  newyorker

all of the pics look good.

it takes time and practice to learn to handle a manual. posted by  tbaxleyjr

Should've figured all taht stuff out on an easier camera, good luck :banghead: posted by  jedimario

Its actually easier to figure out on this one, i am still kinda new though. posted by  newyorker

Uh, no, it's not. posted by  jedimario

I smell napalm from a flame war coming:pop: posted by  Spanky2324

uh, yes it is, dont talk like youre the jedi of canon. posted by  newyorker

Nice shots...Good luck with the camera! posted by  JPolito830

There's some nice wit, please, grace us with another statement from the bowels of your infinite wisdom. posted by  jedimario

have either of you learned on both? I doubt it, since once you've learned, it's kinda hard to learn again.

I suspect that unless one (or both) of you is a photography instructor, then you're only qualified to say "I THINK that it's easier to learn on ....."

Saying "It's easier on this one" .... "no, it's not".... "yes it is" as though it is a hard and fast rule just makes you both look ignorant and well, let's face it, a little unintelligent. posted by  windsonian

What makes it easier is that the quality is better so you dont have to fiddle with as many options. Plus on the old camera to get to the ISO, and everything else is hidden away in different menus. Here its all at hand and quicker and easier to work with. Focus is manual, unlike the other camera where it is controlled by a button, same with zoom, etc. Its a better and easier camera posted by  newyorker

I don't have personal experience, but I'm really just trying to piss newyorker off. Although I do have friends with the more expensive equipment and I know it would have taken me much longer to learn the basics on one of those than my current camera. posted by  jedimario

you might find button focus harder.... doesn't mean others will.

You're still passing off your opinion as fact. .... or trying to. posted by  windsonian

With my camera, I just point and shoot. Focus is automatic. posted by  chris_knows

Funny cause im just sitting here laughing at how you argue like a 6 year old.




Here are 4 more.

http://photos-751.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v241/174/105/332600751/n33 2600751_223699_7836.jpg

http://photos-751.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v241/174/105/332600751/n33 2600751_223713_1622.jpg

A rolling shot that I massacred in photoshop cause it was worse without it.

http://photos-751.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v241/174/105/332600751/n33 2600751_223719_3752.jpg

And one that I think is a big OOF

http://photos-751.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v241/174/105/332600751/n33 2600751_223708_268.jpg posted by  newyorker

That makes boatlaods of sense.



You obviously had a POS camera then (or didn't know how to use it). I've never come across anything like that, so I can see how learning on a Canon would be easier. posted by  jedimario

Here is the end result of one of the pix, I have a higher rez saved and we are going to print it and have it on a stand next to the car at shows this summer.

http://photos-751.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v241/174/105/332600751/n33 2600751_223813_6252.jpg posted by  newyorker

I dont think that your photo "taking" skills are bad but I think your composition is atrocious.

Could just be the way I prefer my stuff though. posted by  Enthusiast

If you are going to print it you might want to at least make it so all the letters are visible. that black thing on the right side takes away from the rest of the picture. you also might want to worry about using your tag on it, as it might belong to someone else that might not want to be held responsible for low quality pictures. posted by  dvdrose18

I doubt anyone else has it.

Its A.dvanced P.hotography, AP being my initials, although im sure its possible, but the words are broken with periods...never looked into it. posted by  newyorker

Everyone says that and I am making a slow and painful progress...what do u suggest? posted by  newyorker

On the first one the shadow of the mirror kills it for me let alone a profile picture is not flattering for that car.

2nd one is just to dull for an automotive shot.

3rd one is just butchered, but even if It wasnt im betting the birght ass light on the hood was killing it.

4th one well its just meh. there is really nothing going on. The color of the car doest stand out compared to its setting. Ive always found that a bright green grassy background works well on grey/silver/pewter cars. And the cement wall line is placed right at the intersection of the hood and glass. If it intersected in the windshield it would make it more exciting. Reflection in the paint is killin it, and the side you face is shaded dulling the car especially considering the hood is brightly lit.

This is jst my opinion on how I like my pictures.
This is one of my personal favorites and it has flaws, but i a few seconds trying to plan it. It was takin with a crappy sony.
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j131/TAEnvy/DSC00545-1.jpg

I tried to make the shaded front and lit back draw attention to the front and I tried to give it a setting that would make the car seem more vibrant. I think the top og the cab was too bright and the shadow on the hood bother me. oh and you can see me in the headlight which pisses me off. It was way too bright to be takin pictures that day but I did my best, the dusk ones came out way better.

I dont claim to be good im not even an amatuer, i just enjoy doing it and my buddys usually ask me to do it for them, and Im just telling you what kills a automotive picture for me. posted by  Enthusiast

^^too big to quote, but i orignally wanted to find a red brick wall to take pix of his car but we didnt see anything posted by  newyorker

I never saw the periods, and now that i think about it, without them it is probably a very common name. In fact, I think that might be the name of the place down the street. posted by  dvdrose18

I really liked this one. Its a completely raw picture. I think the car stands out. Love the way you can just see the GTO on the seat, and it'd be great for a cover of something were text was written in the top or a title. The change in brightness from the light si real gradual and doesnt yank the eye. Although I think the front could be slightly to bright and the rear a little to dull also the lightpole im iffy on.

The light pole shadow and the front license plate bothers me. I could have probably done something with the cut offs to.
http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j131/TAEnvy/DSC00573.jpg posted by  Enthusiast

If you need to add color to a dull setting next time your taking pics of the maxima turn on the orange lights. Or maybe thats just GMs, but it will really stand out on a pewter Z and kinda helps when you dont have much to work with. posted by  Enthusiast

I try to use scenery to help liven up the picture. To me, if its just a picture of a car when you are standing a foot away and snap it is a picture, not a photo. I try to be artistic and creative with it, but it doesnt always work..practice makes perfect, I hope :laughing: posted by  newyorker

Not saying anything about Enthusiast's pictures, but I would have a hard time taking advice from a domestic car guy. Go check out the pictures on a domestic forum vs. import, there's a big difference.

Nothing wrong with it, import guys are usually more into cosmetics and will want their pictures to look better. Domestic guys don't care as much. posted by  jedimario

Wow your retarded. When will yall learn you cant group such big groups like that its ****in retarded. There are people driving civics around that dont give a shit how it looks just how it runs and their are Z28s runnin around that have next to no performance mods but a ton of appearance stuff done.

Dont believe me go to LS1tech and check out the appearance & detailing section and multimedia section.
Some of the best automotive pictures Ive ever seen have been off of tech.

And my friends with imports as me to shoot their car so they must not see the difference, and some of my best pictures are of european and japanese cars. posted by  Enthusiast

OH SNAP!

I was talking about pictures, smarty. posted by  jedimario

http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/1821/22304140dy6.jpg

http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/3296/13di2.jpg

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/9669/11ph5.jpg

http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/9120/21nz3.jpg

4 from work today posted by  newyorker

Disgusting V6 garbage:puke: posted by  Spanky2324

yes it is...feels like riding a horse on ice posted by  newyorker

Not to call BS here, but any reason why you deleted the EXIF data on these photographs? You left it in the original set...

Congrats on your new equipment. I'm a semi-professional photographer (I'm going to college so I don't have loads of time), so if you have questions hit me up.

Always remember that the camera doesn't matter -- it's all about the photographer.

Also, I'd say the easiest way to learn photography is with a fully manual (no in-camera metering, no exposure modes, no AF, not even auto winding) SLR, some good prime lenses (or just a 50mm), and good ole B&W film. Developed, enlarged, and printed by yourself in a darkroom. Granted I could be biased because that's how I learned. That being said, a good digital P&S is going to help you learn tons about composition.

Oh, forgot to reintroduce myself. I'm StiMan. :thumbs: posted by  StiMan