Car Forums  

Go Back   Car Forums > Vehicle Specific > Domestic Cars
FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-26-2005, 04:09 AM   #16
Metzger
CF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 137
That wasn't an option.. and I don't know anything about dodges.. really only grew up around Chevy/GM
Metzger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2005, 05:24 AM   #17
adamc44
CF Freak
 
adamc44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: west portsmouth ohio
Posts: 775
those 283's are really good engines. weve ran a couple in a few derby cars and i know guys who have had real good luck with them. they run strong and can take high revs. i know not all motors are the same but just the few we have had and ran against, no complaints at all. they handle the heat well too. if your so worried about the 350 just drop in a cam and wake that 283 up. your not going to find a 350 very easy for under $350. id offer 1400 for the truck.
__________________
AMERICA: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

http://www.myspace.com/adamc44

adamc44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2005, 06:02 AM   #18
Metzger
CF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 137
I was looking through the classifieds this evening at work and spotted a 350 w/ Tranny for $250 ... so would you recommend buyin' the cam for the 283, or purchasing the 350? If I did get the 283 which cam should I buy?
Metzger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2005, 06:30 AM   #19
adamc44
CF Freak
 
adamc44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: west portsmouth ohio
Posts: 775
well, it really comes down to a matter of opinion, its what ever you want to put the money and work into. that 283 stock is enough to push that truck around plus its already in there and hooked up ready to roll. parts are a little more and if ya put the effort into installing the cam thats going to be quite a bit of work too. the 350 you'll have to buy pull the 283, drop in the 350 and hook everything else back up and try and sell the 283. its got more displacement and way cheaper parts too. rv cam kit great torque prob a 260 or 268 duration.
__________________
AMERICA: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

http://www.myspace.com/adamc44

adamc44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2005, 02:28 PM   #20
glagon1979
daddy x3
 
glagon1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: back in Williamson, NY
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamc44
well, it really comes down to a matter of opinion, its what ever you want to put the money and work into. that 283 stock is enough to push that truck around plus its already in there and hooked up ready to roll. parts are a little more and if ya put the effort into installing the cam thats going to be quite a bit of work too. the 350 you'll have to buy pull the 283, drop in the 350 and hook everything else back up and try and sell the 283. its got more displacement and way cheaper parts too. rv cam kit great torque prob a 260 or 268 duration.

how are parts way cheaper? 260-400 are basically the same engine, right? isn't just about every part on those engines interchangable?
__________________
this forum is to dead to share a cool sig with everybody....
glagon1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2005, 02:30 PM   #21
vwhobo
CF's Anal Orifice
 
vwhobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Redneck Hell
Posts: 8,630
If you don't believe me, believe Marlan;

283-Inch Small-Block Chevy
The Quick Facts
By Marlan Davis

The 283/283hp fuel-injected engine was among the first of the American engines to dispense with carburetion and make 1 hp/ci. Under legendary Corvette engineer Zora Arkus-Duntov's tutelage and encouragement, a slew of factory and aftermarket parts were developed for the 283. With a large variety of parts available, it became easier and cheaper to coax horsepower out of a Chevy small-block than the competition's engines. More enthusiasts gravitated toward the "easy to work on" Chevys, which encouraged the development of even more parts--and so the Chevrolution became self-feeding.

Even after the 327’s debut, the 283 made such a good base engine that it soldiered on through 1967. With its short 3-inch stroke, a 283 can rev as if there’s no tomorrow, but the small bore restricts adding really large valves and, hence, ultimate breathing potential. Except for the Vette 283/315hp option, 283s never came with anything larger than 1.72-/ 1.50-inch valves. You can install only 1.94/1.60 valves without hitting the cylinder walls. The 1.9:1 rod/stroke ratio is on the high side for an acceleration engine but great for an endurance or oval-track engine that runs at a high, constant speed. However, there’s no getting around the fact that a 283 just gives up too many cubic inches (and too much torque). Unless you’re into nostalgia, restoration, or class racing, there is no real reason to build a 283 today.



If a truck engine doesn't need torque, what does it need? That Sierra weighs at least 3800 lbs. And after all, let's face it... There's a reason GM quit building 283's.
__________________
Thanks for the pic, jedimario.

"Everybody believes in something and everybody, by virtue of the fact that they believe in something, use that something to support their own existence."
Frank Vincent Zappa, 1940-1993

vwhobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2005, 05:52 PM   #22
adamc44
CF Freak
 
adamc44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: west portsmouth ohio
Posts: 775
i was just going off my past experiences w/ the engine. of course the ones we ran had 4.56 gears to push the car around. i figured if it can handle what we do to the motor its a good motor.....oh yea... 283's from i think 66-68 were made on the same assembly line as 327 and can be bored over .125 to make a 4 inch bore making a 302. also to tell if you can bore it that much you can look in the crankcase and see grooves cut into the block for clearance of the 327 crank wich you could also put in. but i have to admit.........it would be better to build that 350...im actually tearing one down today!!
__________________
AMERICA: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

http://www.myspace.com/adamc44

adamc44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2011 Car Forums. All rights reserved.