Car Forums  

Go Back   Car Forums > General Discussions > Off Topic
FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-07-2006, 11:43 PM   #1
99integra
CF's Florida boy
 
99integra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 6,099
Question on 2.3

I'm looking for a little swap of a turbo 2.3 out of a Merkur, T-bird or Mustang SVO. Early engines (’83-‘85) used a small .390” lift cam, later engines used a large .400” lift one so it would be one of the later engines. Late ’85-’89 engines had a better flowing exhaust manifold than the earlier version so the engine I would get would be out of the years 85-89. Also all ’83-’89 motors are controlled by the EEC-IV engine management system. It is the same basic system that the ’85-’94 Rangers used so that would be another advantage seeing that my trucks a 93. I am thinking about just using low boost (6-7psi) because a stock Ranger MAF system can handle it without major problems. They have forged pistons, to better to put up with the turbo’s punishment so I'd look into some of those. The EEC-IV system prefers a BPV (as opposed to a BOV) because the venting of previously metered air tends to confuse the computer and can cause an over rich stumble when getting back on the throttle after shifting.

I've been reading up on this a lot and for .10 cents more at the pump and not a huge decrease in mileage I think it would be a good improvement for power. I also don't wanna hear put a 302 in because I have a feeling that would be too much power for a 15 year old

Other than that lemme hear ya'll's input!
__________________
Current whip: walking

Last edited by 99integra : 02-07-2006 at 11:45 PM.
99integra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 11:49 PM   #2
newyorker
MXman
 
newyorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,291
I dont know what ANYTHING means.
__________________
04 Mazdaspeed Miata #2373/4000: IHI, BBS, Harddog, Flyin'Miata.

newyorker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 11:51 PM   #3
Zalight
Who's house? Runs house.
 
Zalight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,264
nah bro dude...like I said, save your money and dump in a twin turbo ls6 into the 'scort.


But I guess if you are hell bent on doing something to the ranger....then the 2.3 SVO engine is definitly a good choice. My friend had a merkur with it and never had any problems from the engine.....had problems with everything else on the car, but not the engine.
__________________
1999 BMW ///M3
Zalight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 11:51 PM   #4
chris_knows
๑۩۞
 
chris_knows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada Status:Trying to find my ish
Posts: 7,630
Sounds sweet, but I'm not sure if you'd really have to use premium in there...I know the KA24DE could take up to 7 psi on regular gas. Keep us posted on what happens
__________________
chris_knows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 11:53 PM   #5
Zalight
Who's house? Runs house.
 
Zalight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,264
yes....because the ka24de would be such a simple swap into a ford ranger......He said so himself that the Ranger uses the same engine control as the SVO, which will make things a hell of a lot easier, although it stil wont be easy, it wil be easier.
__________________
1999 BMW ///M3
Zalight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 12:03 AM   #6
chris_knows
๑۩۞
 
chris_knows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada Status:Trying to find my ish
Posts: 7,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zalight
yes....because the ka24de would be such a simple swap into a ford ranger......He said so himself that the Ranger uses the same engine control as the SVO, which will make things a hell of a lot easier, although it stil wont be easy, it wil be easier.
I know, but what I was trying to get at was that he might not need to run Premium...although it wouldn't be a bad idea to use it...
__________________
chris_knows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 12:38 AM   #7
Scolson
CF Enthusiast
 
Scolson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 155
Your worried about too much power? That's a new one. I also didn't know your only 15. I knew you were younger, but was thinking 17?
__________________
-Chuck Norris is not hung like a horse / horses are hung like Chuck Norris.
-Chuck Norris lost his virginity before his dad did.
-Chuck Norris can make a woman climax by simply pointing at her and saying "booya".
-Chuck Norris only masturbates to pictures of Chuck Norris.
-Chuck Norris invented water.
Scolson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 12:39 AM   #8
99integra
CF's Florida boy
 
99integra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 6,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scolson
Your worried about too much power? That's a new one. I also didn't know your only 15. I knew you were younger, but was thinking 17?
Nah, I just seem to be more mature than my fellow cohorts
__________________
Current whip: walking
99integra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 02:14 AM   #9
Aondor
CF Addict
 
Aondor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by newyorker
I dont know what ANYTHING means.
It means his car coudl take your neon now go cry about it
Yadda yadda
__________________
Aondor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 02:16 AM   #10
Aondor
CF Addict
 
Aondor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99integra
I'm looking for a little swap of a turbo 2.3 out of a Merkur, T-bird or Mustang SVO. Early engines (’83-‘85) used a small .390” lift cam, later engines used a large .400” lift one so it would be one of the later engines. Late ’85-’89 engines had a better flowing exhaust manifold than the earlier version so the engine I would get would be out of the years 85-89. Also all ’83-’89 motors are controlled by the EEC-IV engine management system. It is the same basic system that the ’85-’94 Rangers used so that would be another advantage seeing that my trucks a 93. I am thinking about just using low boost (6-7psi) because a stock Ranger MAF system can handle it without major problems. They have forged pistons, to better to put up with the turbo’s punishment so I'd look into some of those. The EEC-IV system prefers a BPV (as opposed to a BOV) because the venting of previously metered air tends to confuse the computer and can cause an over rich stumble when getting back on the throttle after shifting.

I've been reading up on this a lot and for .10 cents more at the pump and not a huge decrease in mileage I think it would be a good improvement for power. I also don't wanna hear put a 302 in because I have a feeling that would be too much power for a 15 year old

Other than that lemme hear ya'll's input!

Put a 351 in it.
No seriously you should probly be able to run up to 10 psi with out problems.
__________________
Aondor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2011 Car Forums. All rights reserved.