Car Forums  

Go Back   Car Forums > Vehicle Specific > Domestic Cars
FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-12-2005, 12:43 AM   #1
zach3316
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5
mercury cougar

heard some things about the cougar. some good, some bad. yea it is stylish but is it reliable? give me feedback or experiences with the cougar. thanks
zach3316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2005, 03:50 AM   #2
SlipKnoT
The Ultimate Maggot
 
SlipKnoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1,066
Well, what year are we talking about here? My family has never had any problems with Cougars. We had a 1967 and a 1988. Both were great cars, even though the 67 was a rust bucket, but it would start up every time. Right now I know of a 1991 that has over 300,000 miles on it and still runs great. So, from my experiences, Mercury Cougars are great cars.
__________________
1990 Plymouth Laser RS Turbo [Projekt Redline]
Mods: Airbox delete w/ K&N cone, hollowed cat, Fidanza short throw.
HOW FAST!?...we'll find out this summer.

SlipKnoT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2005, 02:58 PM   #3
Pythias
CF Extraordinaire
 
Pythias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio, U.S.
Posts: 1,831
From my experience with 98 and cougars, they were all crap.
__________________
"Though I drive through the valley of rice,I shall fear no turbo for torque art with me. Thy rod and piston, they comfort me."

"It is not the strong who will win, but the winner who is strong." -ROTK7
"You wrote "The World Doesn't Need A Savior" but everyday I hear people crying for one."

Last edited by Pythias : 02-27-2006 at 12:57 AM.
Pythias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2005, 06:54 PM   #4
Oomba
Banned
 
Oomba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pythias
Yes the newest cougars are crap, (the newest body style not sure what year it was changed prolly around 1996) From my experience with THOSE year cougars they were all crap.

1997 was the last year of the V8 RWD Cougar. They then switched to the V6 Cougar in 1999 with the new body style. AKA, the 3rd gen Probe
Oomba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 04:21 PM   #5
hotchckbf420
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
Driveshaft Problems? PLEASE HELP

I'm not sure if any of u know anything about the driveshaft. I have an 89 cougar and it's wrecked but driveable. I just fixed the bearings and hub a week or two ago. When I was driving it to work yesterday and today, I heard a clunking sound that sounded like it was coming from the center of the car. The only reason I say it sounded like it came from the center of the car is because I couldn't pinpoint which side it was coming from or if it was from the rear or front. My rear end is messed up and that's the part i just got fixed. Not to mention my axle needs replaced because it is really loose and warped. But it never sounded like this right after i fixed it. It's not grinding but it sounds like when whatever it is spins, it is clunking. I don't think it's anything to do with the stuff I just replaced because it just barely slows down when I go to stop and I noticed when I was sitting in a drive thru the other day in drive, it was making a clunking noise every once in a while. When I would put it in park it would make 1 more noise and then stop. Please help me find out what it is because the only two good mechanics I know, one of which took 3 weeks to fix my car while it sat on a jack stand, and the other isn't sure what it is. I just want to know cuz i can get it replaced but having someone look at it is a problem.

Thanx
hotchckbf420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 08:10 PM   #6
ChrisV
The Big Meaney
 
ChrisV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 3,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pythias
Yes the newest cougars are crap, (the newest body style not sure what year it was changed prolly around 1996) From my experience with THOSE year cougars they were all crap.

The FWD Cougars were based on the Contour/Mondeo chassis, and were actually pretty good cars. the Duratech 2.5 liter V6 was a strong, reliable engine, and the chassis is very wel sorted 9tehsame one that was used for my SVT Contour).

You better have a really good reason other than "I knew someone with one that broke down once" to say they were all crap...

__________________
I'm not mean. You're just a wuss.



www.midatlantic7s.com
ChrisV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 09:58 PM   #7
Godlaus
UnFedFat in Disguise
 
Godlaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,697
As if your rationale is any better, Chris.

I mean, back it up by saying along the lines of

"Strong and reliable, so much so that Ford actually invited the press to come to a photo shoot and try to destroy the block using a sledgehammer, or to rev the stock engine to whatever RPM they wanted, because ford knew that the engine would hold it's own".

All you state is that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
the Duratech 2.5 liter V6 was a strong, reliable engine, and the chassis is very wel sorted 9tehsame one that was used for my SVT Contour).
"The engine is Good"
"The engine is Strong"
"The engine is reliable"
"Just like my old car"

And we all know how well the contour worked out for you, but that's just your experience, no different than his.
--------------------
Oh, and I've noticed a trend in thees "XYZ car is crap" posts. They all say;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pythias
From my experience with THOSE year cougars they were all crap

My experience....they were all crap...

Hmm....does "my experience" mean that he owned every single one of them?
__________________
I am everything you want to be

Last edited by Godlaus : 02-26-2006 at 10:02 PM.
Godlaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 11:09 PM   #8
ChrisV
The Big Meaney
 
ChrisV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 3,714
[quote=Godlaus]As if your rationale is any better, Chris.[quote]

Sure it is. I never said "ALL OF THEM were wonderful cars!!!"

I only have to refute the statement that all of thew were crap. If you can't see how that works, you're a f*cking moron. And I know you aren't.

Quote:
I mean, back it up by saying along the lines of

"Strong and reliable, so much so that Ford actually invited the press to come to a photo shoot and try to destroy the block using a sledgehammer, or to rev the stock engine to whatever RPM they wanted, because ford knew that the engine would hold it's own".

Don't have to back it up like that to refute the statement that "all of them are crap." All I have to do is point out ONE example or remind him of common journalistic statments to disprove HIS theroy.

Quote:
All you state is that:


"The engine is Good"
"The engine is Strong"
"The engine is reliable"
"Just like my old car"

And we all know how well the contour worked out for you, but that's just your experience, no different than his.


Again, you're being dense. All you have to do to refute a blanket statement of "they are crap" is to prove that even one wan't. Logically, a single one can't be the ONLY example that isn't crap, therefore if one non-crap example exists, then many, many more statistacally exist. Since there are tens of thousands of happy owners, then the statement that "they are crap" is bullshit of the highest order, and no more "backing up" my remarks are necessary.


Quote:
Oh, and I've noticed a trend in thees "XYZ car is crap" posts. They all say;


My experience....they were all crap...

Hmm....does "my experience" mean that he owned every single one of them?

Which is my point, and why pointing out even one contrary example renders their statement null. PERIOD.

Of course, the real difference is that being intentionally insulting and negative is somehow the more valuable goal to strive for, as it's the ONLY TYPE OF STATEMENT YOU'RE WILLING TO DEFEND!!!

__________________
I'm not mean. You're just a wuss.



www.midatlantic7s.com
ChrisV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2006, 12:54 AM   #9
Pythias
CF Extraordinaire
 
Pythias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio, U.S.
Posts: 1,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
The FWD Cougars were based on the Contour/Mondeo chassis, and were actually pretty good cars. the Duratech 2.5 liter V6 was a strong, reliable engine, and the chassis is very wel sorted 9tehsame one that was used for my SVT Contour).

You better have a really good reason other than "I knew someone with one that broke down once" to say they were all crap...


Well my friends sister had one and while driving on the highway with the sunroof up, it somehow simply flew off, not sure how. My other friend's sister had one after her probe 2001 I THINK and at 61k mile the engine blew up. My grandmother had one and the car was simply utter crap.
__________________
"Though I drive through the valley of rice,I shall fear no turbo for torque art with me. Thy rod and piston, they comfort me."

"It is not the strong who will win, but the winner who is strong." -ROTK7
"You wrote "The World Doesn't Need A Savior" but everyday I hear people crying for one."
Pythias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2006, 12:57 AM   #10
Pythias
CF Extraordinaire
 
Pythias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio, U.S.
Posts: 1,831
[quote=ChrisV][quote=Godlaus]As if your rationale is any better, Chris.
Quote:

Sure it is. I never said "ALL OF THEM were wonderful cars!!!"

I only have to refute the statement that all of thew were crap. If you can't see how that works, you're a f*cking moron. And I know you aren't.



Don't have to back it up like that to refute the statement that "all of them are crap." All I have to do is point out ONE example or remind him of common journalistic statments to disprove HIS theroy.




Again, you're being dense. All you have to do to refute a blanket statement of "they are crap" is to prove that even one wan't. Logically, a single one can't be the ONLY example that isn't crap, therefore if one non-crap example exists, then many, many more statistacally exist. Since there are tens of thousands of happy owners, then the statement that "they are crap" is bullshit of the highest order, and no more "backing up" my remarks are necessary.




Which is my point, and why pointing out even one contrary example renders their statement null. PERIOD.

Of course, the real difference is that being intentionally insulting and negative is somehow the more valuable goal to strive for, as it's the ONLY TYPE OF STATEMENT YOU'RE WILLING TO DEFEND!!!


At the end of my quote did I not say from MY experience with those cars? I meant to erase my previous statement of ALL cars because, for one that is contradicting myself in the same post, which I thought you would have pointed out, and for two, because there is almost no production car that ALL of them were crap, I thought you would see that seeing how the END of my post looked. Guess not.

EDIT: There I edited my post so you could understand it a little better.

Also I don't just have ONE bad experience with a car to make it crap, that is simply retarded, every car has it's fair share of problems, and if, FROM MY EXPERIENCE, I have seen more than what I consider the fair share then I will make my opinion based on that.
__________________
"Though I drive through the valley of rice,I shall fear no turbo for torque art with me. Thy rod and piston, they comfort me."

"It is not the strong who will win, but the winner who is strong." -ROTK7
"You wrote "The World Doesn't Need A Savior" but everyday I hear people crying for one."

Last edited by Pythias : 02-27-2006 at 01:01 AM.
Pythias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002 - 2011 Car Forums. All rights reserved.