Car Forums  

Go Back   Car Forums > Vehicle Specific > European Imports
FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-04-2005, 08:41 PM   #1
n401
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
SLK55, M3, new M3, CLK ???

Looking to get a car in a year or so. Looking in the current M3 price range plus/minus a bit.

Option 1 - Current M3 SMG. 0-60 4.8sec
Pros - fast, respected, amazing handling (coupe)
Cons - looks dated, ugly imo, being replaced soon, convertible is slow, convertible handles bad

Option 2 - SLK 55 0-60 4.5 sec
Pros - wicked fast, beats M3s, quite nice looking, convertible
Cons - Some people think it's girly, not as good handling as m3

Option 3 - New M3
Pros - gonna be fast, gonna look quite good
Cons - gonna be very expensive, prolly too much

Option 4- CLK55 0-60 4.7
Pros - Fast, luxury, good looking, beats m3 slightly
Cons - Not as fast as slk, Convertible is quite slow compared to coupe
n401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 08:49 PM   #2
Zalight
Who's house? Runs house.
 
Zalight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,264
The new M3, in a heartbeat. Mercedes cheats to get to their power, through forced induction, and giant displacement. BMW makes their power through refined engineering.
__________________
1999 BMW ///M3
Zalight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 10:40 PM   #3
jedimario
Mr. Hot Wheels
 
jedimario's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clemson University
Posts: 2,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zalight
The new M3, in a heartbeat. Mercedes cheats to get to their power, through forced induction, and giant displacement. BMW makes their power through refined engineering.
Yeah, what he said, plus the M3 looks sooo much better
__________________


UNBAN WHAT
BAN BAV
jedimario is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 10:52 PM   #4
n401
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
Let's add Cayman to the list too.
n401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 10:59 PM   #5
SuperJew
I like pie.
 
SuperJew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Suburbia Central, New York
Posts: 2,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zalight
The new M3, in a heartbeat. Mercedes cheats to get to their power, through forced induction, and giant displacement. BMW makes their power through refined engineering.

cheats? I think not.

uses a different method to create more power? yes.
__________________


CF's Resident Pimp Slapper

Pimp Slap Count (as of 30 May 2004): 34
SuperJew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 11:03 PM   #6
n401
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
I have a lot of respect for M3s, but I do feel like a slk or cayman is more "unique" since lots of people have m3s.

slks looks pretty cool imho

n401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 12:57 AM   #7
StiMan
CF Retired Post Whore
 
StiMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 2,964
Hmm... my friend (who is infact on CF as M3er) has a 2005 M3. Pretty nice, and I do think that SLKs are a bit girly. Hmm... Cayman S is good, but what about RS4 Sedan, or a S4 Cabriolet (Audis)?
__________________
John

StiMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 01:10 AM   #8
Zalight
Who's house? Runs house.
 
Zalight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,264
SLKs are amazingly fast, like break your neck fast. I want to eventually own one, so don't think im bashing it by any means. But yes, they are cheaters. The M division could just as easily thrown forced induction in normal cars and called it a sport upgrade.....But instead they used engineering and technology to make power.


But anyway, the point is:

The new M3 is going to be a refined and sophisticated car with plenty of grunt. The SLK is somewhat exotic and very badass. If money isn't an issue, go with what YOU want.
__________________
1999 BMW ///M3
Zalight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 01:12 AM   #9
StiMan
CF Retired Post Whore
 
StiMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 2,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zalight
SLKs are amazingly fast, like break your neck fast. I want to eventually own one, so don't think im bashing it by any means. But yes, they are cheaters. The M division could just as easily thrown forced induction in normal cars and called it a sport upgrade.....But instead they used engineering and technology to make power.


But anyway, the point is:

The new M3 is going to be a refined and sophisticated car with plenty of grunt. The SLK is somewhat exotic and very badass. If money isn't an issue, go with what YOU want.
Exactly.
__________________
John

StiMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 01:29 AM   #10
n401
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
I was under the impression the SLK55 and CLK55 are naturally aspirated. While the CL, E, and CLS are super charged.
n401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 02:48 AM   #11
Zalight
Who's house? Runs house.
 
Zalight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,264
I think you are right, but the point is that its just a normal SLK with a 5.4 liter V8 instead of the 3.6, and an AMG badge.
__________________
1999 BMW ///M3
Zalight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 12:37 PM   #12
relicensed
CF Enthusiast
 
relicensed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 119
It's your money but, imo the slk especialy and the clk are the hair stylist cars of choice if ya get my meaning?
and I can't see how you think the current m3 looks dated? I think it looks great still. and if they make the new 3 look anything like the rest of the new current range (which they will) I would much rather the m3 we get now.

For some reason bmw seem to make a good model then a bad model over and over. performance and handling allways seem to improve, but styling?????

Well hey, it's real easy to spend when it's not my money. drive them all and ask your friends what they think, very few cars are bought for practical reasons (except the prius). You wont care wot we think compared to the people who will see you everyday in it.

good luck.
relicensed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2005, 12:25 PM   #13
Gumpert-Apollo
CF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5
The old m3 fo sho. Then by a supercharger and stronger brakes
Gumpert-Apollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 05:41 PM   #14
ngluvakov(euro)
CF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mid europe
Posts: 110
M3, SLK or CLK?

As from my point of view, Mercedes Benz never stood any chance in battle with BMW when it comes to comparing of performances. Today these two manufacturers both have good models, but I would still go for BMW. M3 CSL BMW is now lighter, more powerful and aerodynamics is improved. Engine is redesigned so that it can be lighter and provide more power to the ground below the rubber. Engineers in Bavaria have took off 10% of weight, by eliminating air conditioning, seats position electromotor, sound and heat isolation and doors became lighter. That automatically gives car better handling. Roof of the car is made completely of carbon fiber, so 6 kg are gained. It is very considerable, because mass on the roof effects seriously on stability in turns. Airflow is also redesigned, controlled so that air goes directly to the engines intake collector. Composite materials are used in the front bumper, rear bumper made completely out of fiberglass as well as the wall dividing the cabin and trunk. Trunk top is made of SMC plastic with new aerodynamic profile. Rear window is thinner than it is on the M3 serial model. I have not even told all, but overall extremely good sport car that you can drive on streets. If you want to have sportiest M3, you have to ask for CSL. Comfort is not so bad, from the outside car looks the same, so you get the same visual effect as with serial model. To be honest, even Mercedes’ model you have mentioned is extremely good too, because SLK 55 does not exist without AMG. Most powerful Mercedes’ SLK is 320 or something like that, but in AMG version, it is 55. AMG will not provide the rivals with easy battle for market, so new SLK 55 AMG gives unbelievable 360 bhp from its V8 engine of 5.4 liters of engine displacement. Trembles the ground beneath it… Man, I do not know how you got the idea to compare SLK with M3 and finally CLK, which is not even close in classes, however I will try to reply with as little regarding to a class subject as I can. SLK is front engine, rear wheel drive car as most German sport cars. It has max torque at relatively low rpm (510.0 Nm / 4000 rpm) so it has good acceleration. This year’s version completely turned to a sport design. More than last few versions, it is distanced from other Mercedes designs, making a statement of his own. It says, “I may be small I can chew asphalt as not so many even bigger than me can”. I have information that it is being produced with 7-gear automatic transmission, but no real sport car enthusiast drives automatic. Automatic transmission brings weight to car and less top speed. I assume that it will be produced in 6-gear version with manual transmission. It has electronically limited top speed to a 250 km/h, and high-performance braking system with internally ventilated and perforated brake discs & ABS to stop it from raging. This small athlete is very comfort as small car can be. Even taller persons can normally drive it without any trouble. Max power of 360 bhp reaches at 5750 rpm. Engine limited to 6500 rpm. Thunder from exhaust and Stuttgart precision gives this car advantage in choice over all cars in this class. SLK means Sporty Light Compact (Sportlich, Leicht, und Kompakt). SLK Called light because of its weight of 1540 kg. CLK will have its own reply some other day, that would be all for today, I have not more time at hand.
__________________
Gluvakov Nikola
ngluvakov(euro) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 12:03 AM   #15
VG30DE
CF Enthusiast
 
VG30DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 233
CLK's are way girlier than the new SLK's imo. Benz 3-valve SOHC 5.4 has great low end that the BMW DOHC 3.2 can't compete with. The Benz's will be much easier to live with (more streetable). These are reasons I would pick the M3. Presicion to out rev, out shift, and out handle at the expense of creature comforts and granny shifters. Do you turn stoplight's turn into quartermiles or do you carve corners. Either car could do either, but the harder you drive, the more you should think M3. New Z06 anyone?
__________________
Wide Open and Sideways...
VG30DE is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2011 Car Forums. All rights reserved.