Originally Posted by KJester2008
People might laugh when i say its only 140 horses so I figured I would explain a small bit- It would beat the Eclipse GST and the GSX would be close depending on the driver baout .4seconds slower. Idk what you have to pay for an Eclipse but its more than an NX2000. It would rape a Celica GT-S 2002.
Haha. I find it funny when people have their head so far up their cars asses they start to imagine falicys about its potential compared to other cars. What is that NX2000 pulling like 16's stock(according to your information)? It "MAY" be able to(in rare occasions) take on a GS-T on a good day, but the GSX is out of your range in stock form, and no NX2000 would ever be able to touch a GSX in the modified category. The NX2000 is'nt a bad car, but it would be better compared to civic's, accord's, CRX's, prelude's, galant VR-4's, celica's, and FWD alike.
For the record, a good 1g GS-T cost about $800-$3000. A 1G GSX cost about $2000-$5000. 2g GS-T/GSX could cost about $5000-$15000+.
I assume you were reffering to the 1G DSM's, wich in that case are comparible to a NX2000, and even if they run a few hundred more its worth it in the longer run. As the DSM has the more potential than an NX2000.